Indexes & Quartiles

Impact Factor vs CiteScore: which metric should you use?

In short

The Impact Factor (JIF) comes from Clarivate's Web of Science data and uses a 2-year citation window; CiteScore comes from Elsevier's Scopus data and uses a 4-year window. The same journal can have different values in each because they use different databases and time spans. Neither measures article quality — only a journal's average citation level. When comparing, always compare the same metric within the same discipline.

"What's this journal's Impact Factor?" is the most-asked question in academia — but another is increasingly heard alongside it: "And its CiteScore?" Both measure how many citations a journal gets on average, but they come from different databases and are calculated differently. Let's clarify what each is and how to use them when choosing a journal.

What both measure (and what they don't)

Both the Impact Factor and CiteScore show how many citations per article a journal received over a given period. Note: neither measures the quality of your article — there are lightly-cited papers in high-IF journals and heavily-cited papers in low-IF ones. The metric is a rough indicator of a journal's visibility, not of an article's worth.

Side-by-side comparison

Feature Impact Factor (JIF) CiteScore
Source Web of Science — Clarivate Scopus — Elsevier
Citation window 2 years (a 5-year variant also exists) 4 years
Coverage More selective (WoS Core) Broader (Scopus)
Published in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Scopus / Scopus.com
Quartile JCR Q1–Q4 CiteScore Q1–Q4

It's normal for the same journal to have different IF and CiteScore values — different database + different window = different result.

Which should you look at?

The answer depends on context:

Using them correctly

The metric is the last step in journal selection, not the first. The order should be: scope fit first, then the journal's trustworthiness (not predatory), then index/quartile, and finally fine-tuning with the metric. Keep this order when choosing the right journal.

Looking up the IF, CiteScore and quartile of dozens of journals one by one takes time. Peerfect's free journal recommendation engine puts journals that fit your scope in front of you with their metric and quartile information — so you weigh the right metric in the right context, at a glance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the core difference between Impact Factor and CiteScore?

The source and calculation window differ. The Impact Factor (JIF) is based on Web of Science (Clarivate) data with a 2-year citation window; CiteScore is based on Scopus (Elsevier) data with a 4-year window. Because Scopus is broader, CiteScore is assigned to more journals.

Which is more reliable?

Neither is absolutely more reliable; they represent different databases. What matters is which metric is used in your field and by the institution you'll apply to. In most cases, looking at both is the healthiest approach.

Why does the same journal have different values in each metric?

Because they count citations from different databases over different time windows. Web of Science and Scopus cover the same journal differently, and 2-year vs 4-year windows give different results. So a journal having 'IF 3.2, CiteScore 5.1' is normal.

Should I choose a journal by its metric?

A metric alone isn't enough. Scope fit and the journal's trustworthiness come first; the metric is a ranking tool after that. Also compare metrics only within the same discipline — citation cultures differ enormously between fields.

Related articles

Indexes & Quartiles

SCI, SSCI, ESCI, AHCI and Scopus: what's the difference?

What is the difference between SCIE, SSCI, AHCI, ESCI and Scopus? We explain Web of Science vs Scopus, Impact Factor vs CiteScore, and where each one counts — with a simple table.

Journal Selection

How to choose the right journal for your paper

A step-by-step way to choose a fitting, trustworthy journal: scope match, target audience, indexing and quartile, open-access cost, and seeing rejection risk early.

Journal Selection

Best journal finder tools compared (2026)

Elsevier JournalFinder, Springer Suggester, Wiley, JANE, Trinka and Peerfect: an honest comparison of journal-matching tools by coverage, language, method and price.