Revision & Response

What is a minor revision and how to handle it (for beginners)

In short

A minor revision is the strongest sign your paper is very close to acceptance: the reviewers want small fixes. What to do: answer every comment one by one with a concrete change; mark the changes in the text; meet the deadline; attach a polite, reasoned response-to-reviewers letter. If you take all comments seriously, a minor revision very likely ends in acceptance.

You submitted your first paper and the decision arrived: minor revision. Don't panic — this is one of the best outcomes you can get. This guide explains what a minor revision means and how to do it step by step, especially for first-timers.

What does a minor revision mean?

A minor revision means the editor is willing to publish your paper but the reviewers want small fixes. Typical requests: language/wording corrections, adding a missing explanation, a few extra sources, small table/figure fixes, or clarifying a point. It's the decision closest to acceptance in peer review.

Is a minor revision good or bad?

Good. It means the paper's core structure, method and contribution were found acceptable; only polishing remains. Done right, a minor revision very likely ends in acceptance. So see the comments not as an obstacle but as the final touch that strengthens the paper.

How to handle a minor revision (step by step)

  1. List all comments. Extract each reviewer's every item separately.
  2. Answer each comment with a concrete change. "Fixed" isn't enough; show what you changed.
  3. Mark changes in the text (tracked changes/colour) so the editor sees them easily.
  4. Write a response-to-reviewers letter: quote each comment → give your reply → show the revised text (page/line). For a ready skeleton, see the response-to-reviewers template.
  5. Meet the deadline; ask the editor for an extension if needed.

What to watch for in a minor revision

Watch Why
Don't skip any comment An unanswered item is noticed and delays the process.
Don't answer superficially Saying "thanks, noted" without changing anything risks rejection.
Push back politely, with reasons Respectful disagreement is fine; "we didn't" is not.
Don't introduce new errors While fixing, keep title-abstract-conclusion consistent.
Don't miss the deadline A silent delay can lead to withdrawal.

Can a paper still be rejected after a minor revision?

Rarely. A minor revision is usually accepted by the editor (often without sending it back to reviewers) once the fixes are made. Rejection risk comes almost entirely from not taking the comments seriously. So the outcome is largely in your hands.

Minor or major?

If the decision is major revision rather than minor, the requested changes are more extensive (extra analysis, restructuring) and the process is managed differently — see the major revision guide.

A revision request is a sign the paper is close to acceptance. To shorten this round from the start on your next paper, Peerfect's free pre-review engine shows the questions a reviewer will ask before you submit — so you reach acceptance faster, with fewer comments.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a minor revision mean?

A minor revision means the editor is willing to publish your paper but the reviewers want small fixes. These are usually limited changes: language, formatting, a missing explanation, extra references, or small analysis corrections. It's the decision closest to acceptance.

Is a minor revision good or bad?

It's good news. It means the paper is fundamentally acceptable and only needs polishing. If you answer the comments fully and carefully, a minor revision very likely ends in acceptance.

How quickly should a minor revision be done?

The journal usually gives a deadline (commonly a few weeks; the exact period is in the decision letter). If you'll miss it, email the editor in advance for an extension — don't go silent.

Can a paper still be rejected after a minor revision?

Rarely, yes — especially if comments are answered superficially or the requested changes aren't made. But if you meet each comment with a concrete change, a minor revision overwhelmingly ends in acceptance.

Related articles

Revision & Response

How to write a response-to-reviewers letter (template)

How to write a convincing response-to-reviewers letter after a major/minor revision: point-by-point replies, polite but clear language, references to your changes, and a ready-to-use template.

Revision & Response

What is a major revision and how to handle it (for beginners)

I got a major revision — is that a rejection? What a major revision means, how it differs from minor, how to do it, what to watch for, and can it still be rejected? A guide for new authors.

Peer Review

How does peer review work?

Peer review step by step: from submission to decision, from desk check to reviewer rounds. Single vs double-blind, typical timelines, and what editors and reviewers look for.